Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi
Büyük Kütüphane
Adres
Yakın Doğu Bulvarı, Lefkoşa, KKTC
İletişim
[email protected] · +90 (392) 223 64 64
Google Jackets'tan alınan resim
OpenLibrary'den resim

Ex vivo evaluation of various instrumentation techniques and irrigants in reducing E.faecalis within root canals F. Basmaci, M. D. Öztan, M. Kiyan.

Yazar: Materyal türü: MakaleMakaleDil: İngilizce Yayın ayrıntıları:2013. Wiley-Blackwell,ISSN:
  • 0143-2885
Konu(lar): LOC sınıflandırması:
  • WU 230
Çevrimiçi kaynaklar: İçindekiler: International Endodontic Journal SEP 2013, Vol 46 Issue 9, p.823-830Özet: Aim To evaluate ex vivo the effectiveness of single-file instrumentation techniques compared with serial Ni-Ti rotary instrumentation with several irrigation regimens in reducing E.faecalis within root canals. Methodology A total of 81 extracted human mandibular premolar teeth with a single root canal were infected with E.faecalis before and after canal preparation. Samples were divided randomly into 9 groups, as follows: group 1-A: sterile phosphate-buffered saline+Self-adjusting file, group 1-B: 5% sodium hypochlorite+15% EDTA+Self-adjusting file, group 1-C: 5% sodium hypochlorite+7% maleic acid+ Self-adjusting file, group 2-A: sterile phosphate-buffered saline +Reciproc (R25), group 2-B: 5% sodium hypochlorite+15% EDTA+Reciproc (R25), group 2-C: 5% sodium hypochlorite+7% maleic acid+Reciproc (R25), group 3-A: sterile phosphate-buffered saline+ ProTaper, group 3-B: 5% sodium hypochlorite+15% EDTA+ProTaper, group 3-C: 5% sodium hypochlorite+7% maleic acid+ProTaper. anova was used to analyse statistically the differences in terms of reduction in colony counts between the groups, and Dunn's post hoc test was used for multiple comparisons. Results All techniques and irrigation regimens significantly reduced the number of bacterial cells in the root canal (P<0.001). Comparisons amongst the groups revealed significant differences between group 1A (sterile phosphate-buffered saline+Self-adjusting file)/group 1B (5% sodium hypochlorite+15% EDTA+Self-adjusting file) (P=0.031), group 1A (sterile phosphate-buffered saline+Self-adjusting file)/group 2C (5% sodium hypochlorite+7% maleic acid+Reciproc) (P=0.003), group 2A (sterile phosphate-buffered saline+Reciproc)/group 3B (5% sodium hypochlorite+15% EDTA + ProTaper) (P=0.036), group 3B (5% sodium hypochlorite+15% EDTA+ProTaper)/group 1A (sterile phosphate-buffered saline+Self-adjusting file) (P<0.001), and group 3C (5% sodium hypochlorite+7% maleic acid+ProTaper)/group 1A (sterile phosphate-buffered saline+Self-adjusting file) (P=0.033). Conclusions No significant differences in terms of reduction in microbial counts were observed between single-file techniques (SAF and Reciproc) and serial Ni-Ti instrumentation technique (ProTaper) in combination with irrigants.
Bu kütüphanenin etiketleri: Kütüphanedeki eser adı için etiket yok. Etiket eklemek için oturumu açın.
Yıldız derecelendirmeleri
    Ortalama puan: 0.0 (0 oy)
Mevcut
Materyal türü Geçerli Kütüphane Yer numarası Durum Barkod
Online Electronic Document NEU Grand Library Online electronic WU 230 .E9 2013 (Rafa gözat(Aşağıda açılır)) Ödünç verilmez EOL-1100

Aim To evaluate ex vivo the effectiveness of single-file instrumentation techniques compared with serial Ni-Ti rotary instrumentation with several irrigation regimens in reducing E.faecalis within root canals.
Methodology A total of 81 extracted human mandibular premolar teeth with a single root canal were infected with E.faecalis before and after canal preparation. Samples were divided randomly into 9 groups, as follows: group 1-A: sterile phosphate-buffered saline+Self-adjusting file, group 1-B: 5% sodium hypochlorite+15% EDTA+Self-adjusting file, group 1-C: 5% sodium hypochlorite+7% maleic acid+ Self-adjusting file, group 2-A: sterile phosphate-buffered saline +Reciproc (R25), group 2-B: 5% sodium hypochlorite+15% EDTA+Reciproc (R25), group 2-C: 5% sodium hypochlorite+7% maleic acid+Reciproc (R25), group 3-A: sterile phosphate-buffered saline+ ProTaper, group 3-B: 5% sodium hypochlorite+15% EDTA+ProTaper, group 3-C: 5% sodium hypochlorite+7% maleic acid+ProTaper. anova was used to analyse statistically the differences in terms of reduction in colony counts between the groups, and Dunn's post hoc test was used for multiple comparisons.
Results All techniques and irrigation regimens significantly reduced the number of bacterial cells in the root canal (P<0.001). Comparisons amongst the groups revealed significant differences between group 1A (sterile phosphate-buffered saline+Self-adjusting file)/group 1B (5% sodium hypochlorite+15% EDTA+Self-adjusting file) (P=0.031), group 1A (sterile phosphate-buffered saline+Self-adjusting file)/group 2C (5% sodium hypochlorite+7% maleic acid+Reciproc) (P=0.003), group 2A (sterile phosphate-buffered saline+Reciproc)/group 3B (5% sodium hypochlorite+15% EDTA + ProTaper) (P=0.036), group 3B (5% sodium hypochlorite+15% EDTA+ProTaper)/group 1A (sterile phosphate-buffered saline+Self-adjusting file) (P<0.001), and group 3C (5% sodium hypochlorite+7% maleic acid+ProTaper)/group 1A (sterile phosphate-buffered saline+Self-adjusting file) (P=0.033).
Conclusions No significant differences in terms of reduction in microbial counts were observed between single-file techniques (SAF and Reciproc) and serial Ni-Ti instrumentation technique (ProTaper) in combination with irrigants.

Bu materyal hakkında henüz bir yorum yapılmamış.

bir yorum göndermek için.